Sentencing for Civil Contempt

If the court determines the obligor should be incarcerated, CSS must ask the court to set purge conditions at the time of execution of sentencing. The purge conditions may be presented to the court as an agreement between CSS and the obligor. If no agreement is reached as to the purge conditions, the State’s Attorney requests an evidentiary hearing on the ability to purge, per CSQuest article Evidentiary Hearing on Ability to Purge at Trial Court Proceedings for Civil Contempt, in order to set a purge that is appropriate to the obligor’s present ability to pay. This phase of the court proceedings may occur directly after the trial or at a later time, depending on the court.

Sentencing is the stage of the proceeding when the court determines if the obligor should be incarcerated, or if some other measure will compel compliance with the purge conditions. This is the point where Child Support Services (CSS) should urge the court to make the sentence individualized to that person’s circumstances and ability to purge. This may occur immediately following the trial, or later if the obligor does not substantially meet the terms of the purge conditions contained in the Judgment on Contempt (CC2). CSS should never request the court impose incarceration at any stage of the proceedings without evidence the obligor is able to satisfy the purge conditions in a manner acceptable to the court and the State’s Attorney.

When a judge orders the obligor to serve a set number of days in jail and sets a purge fee, the following may occur: