TALLAHASSEE — Hours after a U.S. district judge ruled against them, Florida and three other states late Tuesday asked an appeals court to temporarily halt a new federal rule about sex-based discrimination in education programs.
Attorneys for Florida, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and other plaintiffs scrambled after U.S. District Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on Tuesday issued a 122-page decision that rejected a request for a preliminary injunction against the rule, which deals with Title IX, a landmark 1972 law that bars discrimination in education programs based on sex.
The court fight focuses heavily on a change that would extend Title IX regulations to apply to discrimination based on gender identity. The rule, finalized in April, is slated to take effect Thursday, attorneys for the plaintiffs wrote in the late-Tuesday filing at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The filing seeks an “administrative injunction” to temporarily halt federal officials from enforcing the rule while the plaintiffs’ attorneys prepare a more-detailed request to put the rule on hold. The states contend that the rule could force them to do such things as allow transgender students to use bathrooms that don’t match their sex assigned at birth.
“The regulations require a series of radical changes at schools that take federal money,” the plaintiffs’ attorneys wrote.
But U.S. Department of Justice lawyers argued in a response Wednesday morning that the motion should be denied, saying that the plaintiffs “ask this (appeals) court for immediate injunctive relief barring defendants’ effectuation of portions of a regulation that is about to come into force — in essence, the very preliminary injunction that the district court properly exercised its discretion to decline to issue.”
Axon, an Alabama federal judge nominated to the bench by former President Donald Trump, said the plaintiffs had not provided adequate arguments to obtain a preliminary injunction.
“Plaintiffs must, among other things, establish a substantial likelihood of success on the claims advanced in their complaint to obtain a preliminary injunction from this court,” Axon wrote. “They failed to sustain that burden.”
In part, Axon wrote that the plaintiffs had not adequately backed up their claims that the Biden administration actions were arbitrary and capricious. The states have alleged violations of a law known as the Administrative Procedure Act.
“The court highlights that at later stages in these proceedings, more carefully developed legal arguments and the benefit of a fuller evidentiary record might yield a different result,” Axon wrote. “But the court declines to exercise its discretion to grant the extraordinary relief (a preliminary injunction) plaintiffs have requested.”
The rule and the lawsuit, which was filed in April in the federal Northern District of Alabama, came amid numerous moves by Florida and other Republican-led states in recent years to pass laws and regulations about LGBTQ people. For example, states have prevented transgender students from using school bathrooms that don’t match their sex assigned at birth and blocked or restricted treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy for people with gender dysphoria.
Become a Times subscriber to get our afternoon newsletter, The Rundown
We’ll break down Tampa Bay’s biggest environment, politics, business, education and culture news every weekday.